京都大学文学研究科・思想文化学系では、以下の要領で大学院進学説明会を開催いたします。学年、学部、学内外を問わず、どなたでもご参加いただけます。事前の申し込みは必要ありません。
なお、思想文化学系では、本年度より、従来の入試に加えて、夏期入試も行うことになりました。それについてもこの機会にご説明いたします。
思想文化学系の諸専修への進学に関心をもつ皆様のご参加をお待ちしています。
プログラム：
【第1部】全体の説明
【第２部】各専修に分かれての説明
本件専修が日立京大ラボと共同で行っている、「Society 5.0に向けた応用哲学・倫理学の産学共同研究」について、先日プレスリリースを行いました。
学内リンク：Society 5.0に向けた応用哲学・倫理学の産学共同研究の開始を発表しました。（2018年4月3日）
なお本発表の様子は、同日付けの京都新聞社会面にも掲載されました。
来る4月2日に数学者・数学史家のJeremy Gray教授を京都大学にお迎えして、ヘルマン・ワイルの哲学についてのご講演をいただきます。
参加費、申し込み等必要ございませんので、どうぞ奮ってご参加ください。
また同教授は、3月28日に慶応大学、4月7日に名古屋大学(応用哲学会年次大会シンポジウムとして)でも講演なさいます。そちらもぜひご参加ください。一連の講演の情報は、名古屋大学科学哲学研究室のサイトにまとめていただいていますので、ご参照ください。
日時: 4月2日(月) 16:30-18:00
場所: 京都大学文学部地下1階大会議室(地図8番の建物)
題目: The philosophy of Hermann Weyl
Jeremy Gray教授 (The Open University, University of Warwick)
アブストラクト:
By 1910, the year he turned 25, Weyl was developing a finitist philosophy of mathematics, based on a logical theory of relations. He also believed that the human mind can understand ideas only sequentially. He developed this approach on his book The Continuum (1918), and for a time came close to agreeing with Brouwer’s intuitionism, but he abandoned them in the mid-1920s when he became involved in exploring the theory of Lie groups. He then had to turn back towards Hilbert’s ideas about mathematics and physics, and developed his own theory of what he called the symbolic universe in which mathematics and physics supported each other in complementary ways. Weyl sought a unified philosophy that would govern not only his scientific practice but be rooted in a theory of knowledge and an understanding of how it is acquired.
Jeremy Gray教授・略歴
Jeremy Gray is an Emeritus Professor of The Open University and an Honorary Professor in the Mathematics Department at the University of Warwick. His research interests are in the history of mathematics, specifically the history of algebra, analysis, and geometry, and mathematical modernism in the 19th and early 20th Centuries. The work on mathematical modernism links the history of mathematics with the history of science and issues in mathematical logic and the philosophy of mathematics.
He was awarded the Otto Neugebauer Prize of the European Mathematical Society in 2016 for his work in the history of mathematics, and the Albert Leon Whiteman Memorial Prize of the American Mathematical Society in 2009 for his contributions to the study of the history of modern mathematics internationally. In 2012 he was elected an Inaugural Fellow of the American Mathematical Society. In 2010 he was one of the nine founder members of the Association for the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (APMP).
He is the author of eleven books, of which among the most recent are Plato’s Ghost: The Modernist Transformation of Mathematics (Princeton U.P. 2008), Henri Poincaré: a scientific biography (Princeton 2012), and The Real and the Complex (Springer 2015). Two more books are to be published in 2018: Under the Banner of Number: A History of Abstract Algebra, by Springer, and Simply Riemann in the Simply Charly series of e-books.
以下の要領でCAPEレクチャーが開催されます。奮ってご参加ください。
Speaker: Prof. Leon Horsten (University of Bristol, Kyoto University)
Date and Time: Saturday, March 17, 2018: 15:00-17:00
Venue: 京都大学文学部第２講義室（Lecture room No. 2, 1F of the Building No. 8 of this map）
Title: Naive Metaphysics
Abstract:
In recent publications, Kit Fine proposed a new methodology for metaphysics. According to the traditional way of doing metaphysics in analytical philosophy, one must first sort out ontological questions (“do entities of kind F exist?”). If the answer to such questions is affirmative, then one may proceed to metaphysics proper (“what is the nature of the entities of kind F?”). Fine’s proposal involves an inversion of this order. On his proposed methodology, we must already in a first stage enquire into the nature of the entities that we want to investigate. This stage of the investigation is called *naive metaphysics*. Only in a subsequent, critical stage, should we investigate whether such entities really exist, and whether such entities can ontologically be reduced to other kinds of entities. In my lecture, I will go even further than Fine’s proposal. I will argue that there are sound methodological reasons to concentrate all our efforts on the first stage (naive metaphysics), and to abandon the second, critical, stage altogether.
以下のようにインフォーマルワークショップが開催されます。
皆様のお越しをお待ちしております。
A Workshop on Dogen
Date and Time: March 7, 2018 11:00-18:15
Venue: 京都大学吉田泉殿 Yoshida Izumidono, Kyoto University
Program:
11:00 – 12:00 Yasuo Deguchi (Kyoto) : Self as Anyone
12:00 – 13:00 Lunch
13:00 – 14:00 Shigeru Taguchi (Hokkaido) : Selves in Superposition: Husserl, Tanabe, and Dogen
14:00 – 15:00 Naozumi Mitani (Shinshu) : Trailblazing with Dōgen
15:00 – 15:15 Break
15:15 – 16:15 Hayato Saigo (Nagahama Institute of Bio-Science and Technology) : Without Problem, No Solution:
Toward category-theoretic elucidation of the logic of Buddha, Nāgārjuna and Dōgen
16:15 – 17:15 Naoya Fujikawa (Tokyo Metropolitan) : Eloquence of Silence
17:15 – 18:15 Takeshi Sakon (Osaka City) : TBA (joint work with Shinya Moriyama)
Abstract and more details:
Please visit here (Network for Analytic Asian Philosophy).
掲載が遅くなってしまい申し訳ありません。
以下の要領でワークショップが開催されましたので報告させていただきます。
A Workshop on Humanities in Asia
【日時】2018年2月20日, 21日
【場所】京都大学 吉田泉殿
【プログラム】
2月20日:
13:00 – 14:00 出口康夫 (京都大学)
14:00 – 15:00 佐藤将之 (台湾大学)
15:00 – 15:10 休憩
15:10 – 16:10 小山哲 (京都大学)
16:10 – 16:20 休憩
16:20 – 17:20 望月太郎 (大阪大学)
17:20 – 18:20 小倉紀蔵 (京都大学)
2月21日:
12:00 – 13:00 荒木勝 (岡山大学)
13:00 – 14:00 王小林 (香港城市大学)
14:00 – 14:15 休憩
14:15 – 15:15 落合恵美子 (京都大学)
15:15 – 15:30 休憩
15:30 – 16:30 荒木浩 (日文研)
16:30 – 17:30 小島毅 (東京大学)
以下の要領で、講演会が開催されます。みなさま奮ってご参加ください。
近刊『科学とモデル』（名古屋大学出版会）の著者である、ペンシルバニア大学教授のMichael Weisberg博士をお迎えして、以下のような講演会を行います。Weisberg博士はBiology & Philosophy誌の編集長でもあり、当日は午前中より、同誌への投稿を含めた国際論文投稿How-toに関するワークショップを行います。奮ってご参加下さい。
Speaker: Prof. Michael Weisberg (University of Pennsylvania)
Date: October 21st 2017
Time: 16:30-18:00
Venue: Large conference room in the basement, Faculty of Letters MainBuilding, Yoshida Campus, Kyoto University.
Title: Confirmation Theory for Idealized Models
Abstract:
When a flu pandemic strikes, who should get vaccinated first? What’s our best strategy for minimizing the damage of global climate change? Why is Philadelphia racially segregated? Why do most sexually reproducing species have only two sexes, in roughly even proportions? These and many other scientific and practical problems are studied with highly idealized mathematical and computational models. When should we believe these models and follow the advice they suggest? Philosophy of science tells us that we should believe models when they are well-confirmed, but this simple answer isn’t very helpful here. Traditional confirmation theory explains how empirical evidence bears on the truth of hypotheses and theories, but the highly idealized models at the heart of the life and social sciences are known to be false from the outset. Moreover, classical ideas about confirmation have been developed for relatively simple hypotheses, while many contemporary models have thousands of variables.
Despite these challenges, it is possible to develop an account of model confirmation that can speak to the reliability of models and their results. I will sketch a theory that has two parts: First, theorists validate models, confirming hypotheses about model/target system relations. Second, they employ robustness analysis to investigate the stability of model results. Taken together, validation and robustness tell us when models are reliable and help us understand the appropriate domain of their application. Not only does this theory better align our accounts of scientific method with modern theoretical practice, it also helps us understand when to believe the results of models.
以下のようにインフォーマルワークショップが開催されます。
皆様のお越しをお待ちしております。
道元の「自己」についての学際ラウンドテーブルトーク
An Interdisciplinary Round Talk Discussion on Dogen’s Self
以下のようにワークショップを開催いたします。是非ご参加下さい。
概要などの詳細はウェブサイトをご覧下さい。
Kyoto Philosophical Logic Workshop III
【日時】2017年9月7日, 8日, 9日
【場所】京都大学 吉田泉殿(7日、9日)、芝蘭会館別館(8日)
【ウェブサイト】https://sites.google.com/site/hitoshiomori/home/workshops/kplw-3
【プログラム】
September 7:
The third workshop on connexive logic, co-organized by Heinrich Wansing and Hitoshi Omori
11:00–12:00 Norihiro Kamide “Bi-classical connexive logic and its modal extension: Cut-elimination, completeness and duality”
12:00–13:00 Tomasz Jarmużek “Connexive logics defined by relating semantics and tableau approach”
13:00–14:30 Lunch
14:30–15:00 Sara Ipakchi “A justification for Aristotle Thesis AT on the basis of LNC”
15:00–16:00 Wolfgang Lenzen “Is connexive logic based on a gross misunderstanding? A Leibnitian approach”
16:00–16:15 Coffee break
16:15–17:15 Heinrich Wansing “Connexive Logic and Chellas-Segerberg Semantics”
17:15–18:15 Andreas Kapsner “What is Connexivity? Lessons from Constructive and Conditional Logics”
19:00– Dinner
September 8:
09:15–10:15 Yasuo Deguchi “Analytic Nishida: Metaphysics of Self and Non-classial Logic”
10:15–11:15 Rafał Urbaniak “Paradoxes of informal provability and many-valued indeterministic provability logic”
11:15–12:15 Toshiharu Waragai “Lesniewski’s Ontology from a Syllogistic Point of View”
12:15–13:30 Lunch
Special session on Leibniz’s logic
13:30–14:30 Ryosuke Igarashi “A Comparison of the Logical Systems of Leibniz and Kant”
14:30–15:30 Hiroyuki Inaoka “Mathematics as make-believe: Infinite diagram in Leibniz’s mathematical study”
15:30–15:45 Coffee break
15:45–16:45 Shinji Ikeda “Extension and Space in Leibniz’s Theory of Abstraction”
16:45–17:45 Wolfgang Lenzen “The evolution of the system of Leibniz’s logic”
18:30– Dinner
September 9:
10:00–11:00 Vít Punčochář “Between material and strict implication”
11:00–12:00 Igor Sedlár “Term negation in first-order logic”
12:00–13:30 Lunch
13:30–14:30 Yasuo Nakayama “Philosophical Basis for Dynamic Belief-Desire-Obligation Logic”
14:30–15:30 Shunsuke Yatabe “TBA”
15:30–15:45 Coffee break
15:45–16:45 Makoto Kanazawa “Lambek Calculus and Context-Free Grammars: Some Unresolved Issues”
16:45–17:45 Heinrich Wansing “Disentangling FDE-based Paraconsistent Modal Logics”
18:30– Dinner
